GNU bug report logs -
#65383
[gnome-team] Nothing is reproducible anymore
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 65383 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 65383 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65383
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 19 Aug 2023 14:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 19 Aug 2023 14:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I have absolutely no idea how this came to be:
sh-5.1$ ./pre-inst-env guix build gdk-pixbuf --dry-run
substitute: Liste der Substitute von „https://ci.guix.gnu.org“ wird
aktualisiert … 100.0%
substitute: Liste der Substitute von „https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org“
wird aktualisiert … 100.0%
The following derivations would be built:
/gnu/store/sn4avcl518i75r6595ns5k1w22m1h93z-gdk-pixbuf-2.42.8.drv
/gnu/store/z359nfywzyhbfydbnv05h1cc3av2fqbc-shared-mime-info-2.2.drv
sh-5.1$ ./pre-inst-env guix build gdk-pixbuf --dry-run
substitute: Liste der Substitute von „https://ci.guix.gnu.org“ wird
aktualisiert … 100.0%
substitute: Liste der Substitute von „https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org“
wird aktualisiert … 100.0%
The following derivations would be built:
/gnu/store/50pk294x08jpgzpag8z4877pa6s5bc8h-gdk-pixbuf-2.42.8.drv
/gnu/store/5375hf13vnxab7lyrbxqg3ss7q39lxml-shared-mime-info-2.2.drv
The hash changes with each run. What the hell is going on?
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65383
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 19 Aug 2023 15:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 65383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> I have absolutely no idea how this came to be:
>
> sh-5.1$ ./pre-inst-env guix build gdk-pixbuf --dry-run
> substitute: Liste der Substitute von „https://ci.guix.gnu.org“ wird
> aktualisiert … 100.0%
> substitute: Liste der Substitute von „https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org“
> wird aktualisiert … 100.0%
> The following derivations would be built:
> /gnu/store/sn4avcl518i75r6595ns5k1w22m1h93z-gdk-pixbuf-2.42.8.drv
> /gnu/store/z359nfywzyhbfydbnv05h1cc3av2fqbc-shared-mime-info-2.2.drv
> sh-5.1$ ./pre-inst-env guix build gdk-pixbuf --dry-run
> substitute: Liste der Substitute von „https://ci.guix.gnu.org“ wird
> aktualisiert … 100.0%
> substitute: Liste der Substitute von „https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org“
> wird aktualisiert … 100.0%
> The following derivations would be built:
> /gnu/store/50pk294x08jpgzpag8z4877pa6s5bc8h-gdk-pixbuf-2.42.8.drv
> /gnu/store/5375hf13vnxab7lyrbxqg3ss7q39lxml-shared-mime-info-2.2.drv
>
> The hash changes with each run. What the hell is going on?
Just this morning, looking at <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65179> I
found that AR (okay x86_64-w64-mingw32-AR) embeds timestamps in the
archives it creates.
Greetings,
Janneke
--
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65383
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 19 Aug 2023 16:00:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 65383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> I have absolutely no idea how this came to be:
> …
> The hash changes with each run. What the hell is going on?
I don’t know. I’ve seen a not reproducible error with guix challenge
guile.
I would expect this when running with --tune, but not from the build
servers:
$ LANG=C guix challenge guile
/gnu/store/4gvgcfdiz67wv04ihqfa8pqwzsb0qpv5-guile-3.0.9 contents differ:
local hash: 1mn4ahip1cywc2nkq7lbgjfgdws9r283r3r12yq6ijg1b2zi5yz6
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/4gvgcfdiz67wv04ihqfa8pqwzsb0qpv5-guile-3.0.9: 1mn4ahip1cywc2nkq7lbgjfgdws9r283r3r12yq6ijg1b2zi5yz6
https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/4gvgcfdiz67wv04ihqfa8pqwzsb0qpv5-guile-3.0.9: 17gvhxrcngyjjy2mlr9j2x6xv0x16b7dnf6dpz00vfqvddq9i2dz
differing file:
/lib/guile/3.0/ccache/ice-9/ftw.go
1 store items were analyzed:
- 0 (0.0%) were identical
- 1 (100.0%) differed
- 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65383
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 19 Aug 2023 16:00:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 19 Aug 2023 18:57:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 19 Aug 2023 18:57:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 65383-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
The culprit has been found [1] and arrested [2]. It turns out that the
ungexp Bruno used at the time was "too wide", resulting in a new .drv
for shared-mime-info each time. This wasn't caught during review,
because who has time to build things twice?
What are the lessons learned from this?
1. Closely look at when and how you use ungexp.
2. Actually build things multiple times ;)
Perhaps we can also add this to the things to check in continuous
integration, though with the fair amount of known unreproducible
packages, I'm not so sure of how great this will go.
Anyway, thanks for your attention.
Cheers
[1] http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2023-08-19.log#184540
[2] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=gnome-team&id=e43498b32dcbbf055d72339086213cd60c336acf
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 17 Sep 2023 11:24:08 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 246 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.