GNU bug report logs -
#60488
string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8
Previous Next
Reported by: festerdam <at> posteo.net
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 08:54:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Jean Abou Samra <jean <at> abou-samra.fr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 60488 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 60488 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#60488
; Package
guile
.
(Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
festerdam <at> posteo.net
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 02.01.2023 05:12, festerdam <at> posteo.net wrote:
> The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile
> 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories):
> (string-ref "my string" -3)
>
> gdb's backtrace is the following:
>
> #0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1
> #24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
> #26 0x000055555555510f in ?? ()
> #27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main
> (main=main <at> entry=0x5555555550b0, argc=argc <at> entry=1,
> argv=argv <at> entry=0x7fffffffe0b8) at
> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
> #28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5555555550b0,
> argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0b8, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized
> out>, rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe0a8) at
> ../csu/libc-start.c:381
> #29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? ()
Sorry, didn't see #59874. This bug report is a duplicate of that bug.
Therefore this should be closed.
Reply sent
to
Jean Abou Samra <jean <at> abou-samra.fr>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 02 Jan 2023 09:02:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
festerdam <at> posteo.net
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Mon, 02 Jan 2023 09:02:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 60488-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Le 2 janv. 2023 à 09:54, festerdam <at> posteo.net a écrit :
>
> On 02.01.2023 05:12, festerdam <at> posteo.net wrote:
>> The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile
>> 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories):
>> (string-ref "my string" -3)
>> gdb's backtrace is the following:
>> #0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1
>> #24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #26 0x000055555555510f in ?? ()
>> #27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main
>> (main=main <at> entry=0x5555555550b0, argc=argc <at> entry=1,
>> argv=argv <at> entry=0x7fffffffe0b8) at
>> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
>> #28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5555555550b0,
>> argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0b8, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized
>> out>, rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe0a8) at
>> ../csu/libc-start.c:381
>> #29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? ()
>
> Sorry, didn't see #59874. This bug report is a duplicate of that bug. Therefore this should be closed.
>
>
>
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 87 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.