GNU bug report logs -
#36931
guile-bash repository no longer exists?
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 36931 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 36931 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36931
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:19:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357 <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
guile-bash fails to build. The site https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/use
rs/kaction-guest/retired/dev.guile-bash.git says it is not on the web
server.
I checked the wayback machine, github, and gitlab for some sort of
backup, but have had no luck. Is there a trustworthy replacement
source? If not, I'm not sure we should keep the package.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36931
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:39:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 36931 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357 <at> gmail.com> writes:
> guile-bash fails to build. The site https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/use
> rs/kaction-guest/retired/dev.guile-bash.git says it is not on the web
> server.
Perhaps a copy of the sources can be found in the Software Heritage
archive?
--
Ricardo
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36931
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 05 Aug 2019 20:40:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 36931 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, 05 Aug 2019 16:38:07 +0200
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> wrote:
> Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > guile-bash fails to build. The site
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/use
> > rs/kaction-guest/retired/dev.guile-bash.git says it is not on the
> > web server.
>
> Perhaps a copy of the sources can be found in the Software Heritage
> archive?
This was already discussed in
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33861
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-04/msg00558.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-05/msg00234.html
This software is unmaintained and nobody is willing to maintain it.
If nobody complains, we should drop it from Guix.
Here is an archive of a git repository:
https://alioth-archive.debian.org/git/users/kaction-guest/retired/guile-bash.git.tar.xz
But it doesn't have any commit with id
1eabc563ca5692b3e08d84f1f0e6fd2283284469
which is the one we use in Guix.
I tried to download it from SWH, but it failed:
$ guix build -S --no-substitutes guile-bash
The following derivation will be built:
/gnu/store/vrw4yfy4ln6yvc3wwppw4bwiaxdzl4jp-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout.drv
building /gnu/store/vrw4yfy4ln6yvc3wwppw4bwiaxdzl4jp-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout.drv...
environment variable `PATH' set to `/gnu/store/q09sy224qnxrp982z4xfaxi19721mjx8-gzip-1.9/bin:/gnu/store/ipx79bfj2mrc8npj7s3qi3zri11jfhaw-tar-1.30/bin'
Initialized empty Git repository in /gnu/store/7p7mkiqv9ah6x0x20qzpas44sdf7jqkl-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout/.git/
fatal: repository 'https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/retired/dev.guile-bash.git/' not found
Failed to do a shallow fetch; retrying a full fetch...
fatal: repository 'https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/retired/dev.guile-bash.git/' not found
git-fetch: '/gnu/store/04abn97vvc06c84pi8cb3lni9jyxfzmf-git-minimal-2.22.0/bin/git fetch origin' failed with exit code 128
Trying content-addressed mirror at berlin.guixsd.org...
Trying content-addressed mirror at berlin.guixsd.org...
Backtrace:
4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/ixb9ja1vxd46ydf83qbj9f3f6qz?")
In ./guix/swh.scm:
532:8 3 (call-with-temporary-directory #<procedure 8e7740 at ./?>)
552:10 2 (_ "/tmp/guix-build-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout?")
In ./guix/build/utils.scm:
778:22 1 (_)
In unknown file:
0 (get-bytevector-n! #f #vu8(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?) ?)
ERROR: In procedure get-bytevector-n!:
In procedure get-bytevector-n!: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting open input port): #f
builder for `/gnu/store/vrw4yfy4ln6yvc3wwppw4bwiaxdzl4jp-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout.drv' failed with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/vrw4yfy4ln6yvc3wwppw4bwiaxdzl4jp-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/vr/w4yfy4ln6yvc3wwppw4bwiaxdzl4jp-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout.drv.bz2'.
guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/vrw4yfy4ln6yvc3wwppw4bwiaxdzl4jp-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout.drv' failed
Maybe it is not part of SWH? Message could be nicer. Though when I'm
searching for individual files from above git repository, I can find
them in SWH:
https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/content/sha1_git:dded8caad51a40c90c763fcf23ad18522f0e90d8/
https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/content/44a728397230f178c02131a001c884808bcd2d39/
It would be interesting if I can go in SWH from a file to the full
repository. Does anyone know if that is possible?
Björn
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36931
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 06 Aug 2019 01:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 36931 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 16:38 +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > guile-bash fails to build. The site https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit
> > /use
> > rs/kaction-guest/retired/dev.guile-bash.git says it is not on the
> > web
> > server.
>
> Perhaps a copy of the sources can be found in the Software Heritage
> archive?
>
> --
> Ricardo
>
I don't know if it's exactly the same, but I found something similar at
https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/https://github.com/k
action/guile-bash/directory/
Thanks for the suggestion.
I requested a tarball, and received this statement in the email:
"Please keep in mind that this link might expire at some point, in
which case you will need to request the bundle again."
Do you have any recommendations on where to host the tarball? If
necessary, I am willing to create a repository for the code on my
github.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36931
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:31:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 36931 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello SWH!
We noticed¹ that the ‘fetch_url’ of this Vault entry returns 404:
https://archive.softwareheritage.org/api/1/vault/directory/ad8976564375ee55f645387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf/
Is that supposed to happen? I don’t remember hitting a ‘fetch_url’ that
would be 404 before.
For the record, it corresponds to this revision:
https://archive.softwareheritage.org/api/1/revision/1eabc563ca5692b3e08d84f1f0e6fd2283284469/
Thanks in advance,
Ludo’.
¹ Originally reported at <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/36931>.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36931
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:33:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 36931 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de> skribis:
> Backtrace:
> 4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/ixb9ja1vxd46ydf83qbj9f3f6qz?")
> In ./guix/swh.scm:
> 532:8 3 (call-with-temporary-directory #<procedure 8e7740 at ./?>)
> 552:10 2 (_ "/tmp/guix-build-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout?")
> In ./guix/build/utils.scm:
> 778:22 1 (_)
> In unknown file:
> 0 (get-bytevector-n! #f #vu8(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?) ?)
>
> ERROR: In procedure get-bytevector-n!:
> In procedure get-bytevector-n!: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting open input port): #f
Ouch. I’ve improved error reporting handling here, but I think the
fundamental issue is that SWH is failing to deliver this thing, even
though it does have it:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix swh)
scheme@(guile-user)> (lookup-revision "1eabc563ca5692b3e08d84f1f0e6fd2283284469")
$18 = #<<revision> id: "1eabc563ca5692b3e08d84f1f0e6fd2283284469" date: #<date nanosecond: 0 second: 35 minute: 27 hour: 9 day: 27 month: 2 year: 2015 zone-offset: 10800> directory: "ad8976564375ee55f645387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf" directory-url: "/api/1/directory/ad8976564375ee55f645387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf/">
scheme@(guile-user)> (vault-fetch (revision-directory $18) 'directory)
$19 = #f
scheme@(guile-user)> (query-vault (revision-directory $18) 'directory)
$20 = #<<vault-reply> id: 3296879 fetch-url: "/api/1/vault/directory/ad8976564375ee55f645387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf/raw/" object-id: "ad8976564375ee55f645387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf" object-type: directory progress-message: #nil status: done>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Let’s see!
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36931
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 36931 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:32:38 +0200
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Ouch. I’ve improved error reporting handling here, but I think the
> fundamental issue is that SWH is failing to deliver this thing, even
> though it does have it:
Thanks for looking into this. Let's see what SWH has to say.
After all, I think we should leave this pack in Guix. At least it is a
good SWH-test-package :-)
Björn
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36931
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:38:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 36931 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
* Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr> [2019-08-23 18:30:17 +0200]:
> Hello SWH!
>
> We noticed¹ that the ‘fetch_url’ of this Vault entry returns 404:
>
> https://archive.softwareheritage.org/api/1/vault/directory/ad8976564375ee55f645387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf/
>
> Is that supposed to happen? I don’t remember hitting a ‘fetch_url’ that
> would be 404 before.
>
> For the record, it corresponds to this revision:
>
> https://archive.softwareheritage.org/api/1/revision/1eabc563ca5692b3e08d84f1f0e6fd2283284469/
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Ludo’.
>
> ¹ Originally reported at <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/36931>.
Hi!
We've recently moved the Software Heritage Vault to different infrastructure.
In doing so, the existing bundles were scrapped; however, the old cache entries
in the database hadn't been invalidated.
I've now made sure that pre-migration cache entries have been invalidated. I've
also scheduled cooking of objects that had been accessed recently, including
the one you've referenced, and they should now be available for download (or
at least trickling in).
Thanks for the report!
--
Nicolas Dandrimont
if (argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "-advice") == 0) {
printf("Don't Panic!\n");
exit(42);
}
(Arnold Robbins in the LJ of February '95, describing RCS)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36931
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 36931 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Nicolas Dandrimont <nicolas <at> dandrimont.eu> skribis:
> We've recently moved the Software Heritage Vault to different infrastructure.
> In doing so, the existing bundles were scrapped; however, the old cache entries
> in the database hadn't been invalidated.
Oh I see.
> I've now made sure that pre-migration cache entries have been invalidated. I've
> also scheduled cooking of objects that had been accessed recently, including
> the one you've referenced, and they should now be available for download (or
> at least trickling in).
It’s much nicer now. I guess we have a good test case. :-)
Thanks for explaining!
Ludo’.
Added tag(s) fixed.
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
36931 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357 <at> gmail.com>
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 169 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.