GNU bug report logs - #31045
split -e missing in split 8.4 version

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 31045 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 31045 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Abhijeet Patwari <patwari.abhijeet <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: split -e missing in split 8.4 version
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:29:52 +0530

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I was using split 8.25 version. In my code, I have used split -e option.
After server upgrade, split also got upgraded and my code is giving error
at split -e.

Kindly let me know what is the equivalent of split -e in 8.4. OR any
alternate solution for this.

-- 
Regards,
Abhijeet Patwari
Mob. No. +91 8147811997

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #12 received at 31045-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Abhijeet Patwari <patwari.abhijeet <at> gmail.com>, 31045-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#31045: split -e missing in split 8.4 version
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 09:25:56 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tag 31045 notabug
thanks

On 04/03/2018 05:59 AM, Abhijeet Patwari wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was using split 8.25 version. In my code, I have used split -e option.
> After server upgrade, split also got upgraded and my code is giving error
> at split -e.
> 
> Kindly let me know what is the equivalent of split -e in 8.4. OR any
> alternate solution for this.

Coreutils 8.4 is NOT an upgrade, but a downgrade, in relation to 8.25.
'split -e' was added in coreutils 8.8 (commit be10739) (although the
NEWS file forgot to mention it; -e was added at the same time as
--number, but only --number was mentioned in the NEWS).

Your solution, then, is to actually upgrade coreutils back up to a
version that has the features you want, or to rewrite your script to not
require the use of that feature as it is not portable to the bare
minimum behavior that POSIX requires of split.

But since we can't retroactively add features to older releases, there's
no bug to  fix here, so I'm closing this bug in the database.  Feel free
to add more comments on the topic, though, as needed.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.