GNU bug report logs - #25138
guix import hackage darcs: fails due to flag executable

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 25138 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 25138 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dave Love <fx <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: failing hackage import
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 13:56:12 +0000

With guix 20161208.12 I see the following, which would probably take me
a while to debug as I don't know my way around.  (With the 0.11.0
version I got a different error without a backtrace.  I upgraded after
seeing a bug fix for hackage in the tracker.)

  $ guix import hackage -t darcs
  Backtrace:
  In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
   160: 16 [catch #t #<catch-closure 11e6e40> ...]
  In unknown file:
     ?: 15 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 11e6e40>]
  In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
    66: 14 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
  In ice-9/eval.scm:
   432: 13 [eval # #]
  In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  2404: 12 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 1206900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
  4056: 11 [#<procedure 1206900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
  1727: 10 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
  1732: 9 [#<procedure 1219b70 ()>]
  In unknown file:
     ?: 8 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/hckw4cw3m6r55afrldhn9gf66wrznh7i-guix-0.11.0-8.8d12/bin/.guix-real"]
  In guix/ui.scm:
  1222: 7 [run-guix-command import "hackage" "-t" "darcs"]
  In guix/scripts/import.scm:
   110: 6 [guix-import "hackage" "-t" "darcs"]
  In guix/scripts/import/hackage.scm:
   110: 5 [guix-import-hackage "-t" "darcs"]
  In guix/import/hackage.scm:
   247: 4 [hackage->guix-package "darcs" #:include-test-dependencies? ...]
   113: 3 [hackage-fetch "darcs"]
  In guix/import/cabal.scm:
   580: 2 [read-cabal #<input: r6rs-custom-binary-input-port 38ef8f0> #f]
  In system/base/lalr.upstream.scm:
  1956: 1 [___run]
  1851: 0 [___push 1 6 ...]
  
  system/base/lalr.upstream.scm:1851:2: In procedure ___push:
  system/base/lalr.upstream.scm:1851:2: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure ___push (delta new-category lvalue tok)>

Message #8 received at 25138 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Dave Love <fx <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Federico Beffa <beffa <at> ieee.org>, 25138 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25138: failing hackage import
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 21:57:49 +0100

Hi,

Dave Love <fx <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> With guix 20161208.12 I see the following, which would probably take me
> a while to debug as I don't know my way around.  (With the 0.11.0
> version I got a different error without a backtrace.  I upgraded after
> seeing a bug fix for hackage in the tracker.)
>
>   $ guix import hackage -t darcs
>   Backtrace:
>   In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>    160: 16 [catch #t #<catch-closure 11e6e40> ...]
>   In unknown file:
>      ?: 15 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 11e6e40>]
>   In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>     66: 14 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
>   In ice-9/eval.scm:
>    432: 13 [eval # #]
>   In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   2404: 12 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 1206900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
>   4056: 11 [#<procedure 1206900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
>   1727: 10 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
>   1732: 9 [#<procedure 1219b70 ()>]
>   In unknown file:
>      ?: 8 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/hckw4cw3m6r55afrldhn9gf66wrznh7i-guix-0.11.0-8.8d12/bin/.guix-real"]
>   In guix/ui.scm:
>   1222: 7 [run-guix-command import "hackage" "-t" "darcs"]
>   In guix/scripts/import.scm:
>    110: 6 [guix-import "hackage" "-t" "darcs"]
>   In guix/scripts/import/hackage.scm:
>    110: 5 [guix-import-hackage "-t" "darcs"]
>   In guix/import/hackage.scm:
>    247: 4 [hackage->guix-package "darcs" #:include-test-dependencies? ...]
>    113: 3 [hackage-fetch "darcs"]
>   In guix/import/cabal.scm:
>    580: 2 [read-cabal #<input: r6rs-custom-binary-input-port 38ef8f0> #f]
>   In system/base/lalr.upstream.scm:
>   1956: 1 [___run]
>   1851: 0 [___push 1 6 ...]
>   
>   system/base/lalr.upstream.scm:1851:2: In procedure ___push:
>   system/base/lalr.upstream.scm:1851:2: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure ___push (delta new-category lvalue tok)>

I’m seeing a different error:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ git describe
v0.11.0-3322-gf80b4d2
$ ./pre-inst-env guix import hackage -t darcs
Syntax error: unexpected token : (buildable (False)) (at line 494, column 4)
Syntax error: unexpected end of input
guix import: error: failed to download cabal file for package 'darcs'
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The .cabal file is at
<https://hackage.haskell.org/package/darcs/darcs.cabal> and the faulty
line comes from:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Executable          darcs
  if !flag(executable)
    buildable: False
  else
    buildable: True
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

In addition, this .cabal file has “Build-Type: Custom”, which is
currently not supported as noted in <https://bugs.gnu.org/23961>.

Federico, WDYT?

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Message #11 received at 25138 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Federico Beffa <beffa <at> ieee.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Dave Love <fx <at> gnu.org>, 25138 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25138: failing hackage import
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 23:09:36 +0100

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> I’m seeing a different error:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ git describe
> v0.11.0-3322-gf80b4d2
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix import hackage -t darcs
> Syntax error: unexpected token : (buildable (False)) (at line 494, column 4)
> Syntax error: unexpected end of input
> guix import: error: failed to download cabal file for package 'darcs'
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> The .cabal file is at
> <https://hackage.haskell.org/package/darcs/darcs.cabal> and the faulty
> line comes from:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> Executable          darcs
>   if !flag(executable)
>     buildable: False
>   else
>     buildable: True
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> In addition, this .cabal file has “Build-Type: Custom”, which is
> currently not supported as noted in <https://bugs.gnu.org/23961>.
>
> Federico, WDYT?

The problem is that the name of the flag is 'executable' and the
string 'executable' is also a reserved keyword to define the start of
a cabal file section.  The cabal parser incorrectly dismissed this
keyword as a possible flag name (in the code it is referred to as a
test identifier).  See line 369 of the file 'guix/import/cabal.scm'.
The predicate 'is-id' should be smarter and recognize if the string
'executable' refers to the start of an 'executable section' or not
(and similarly for some other reserved keywords dismissed by the same
procedure).

The predicate 'is-id' dismisses some specific reserved keywords such
as 'executable' because this check is performed before the ones (based
on full lines) such as 'is-exec' which checks for the start of an
executable section.

HTH,
Fede

Message #14 received at 25138 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dave Love <fx <at> gnu.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Federico Beffa <beffa <at> ieee.org>, 25138 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25138: failing hackage import
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:40:59 +0000

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> I’m seeing a different error:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ git describe
> v0.11.0-3322-gf80b4d2
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix import hackage -t darcs
> Syntax error: unexpected token : (buildable (False)) (at line 494, column 4)
> Syntax error: unexpected end of input
> guix import: error: failed to download cabal file for package 'darcs'
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

That's what I saw with 0.11, but the new version with the backtrace
seemed a worthwhile improvement!  (I tried an update after looking for a
way to configure generating backtraces and not finding one for guix or
an environment variable for guile that might have done it.)

Message #17 received at 25138 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Robert Vollmert <rob <at> vllmrt.net>
To: 25138 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: updated import error
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 17:39:40 +0200

These days it’s:

Syntax error: unexpected token : (buildable (False)) (at line 471, column 4)
Syntax error: unexpected end of input

Relevant cabal extract:

   469  Executable          darcs
   470    if !flag(executable)
   471      buildable: False
   472    else
   473      buildable: True
   474  

Message #24 received at 25138-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>
To: Dave Love <fx <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 25138-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: guix import hackage darcs: fails due to flag executable
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:34:35 +0200

Hi,

this was fixed by the patch from #50588.

Cheers,
Lars

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.