GNU bug report logs -
#21879
WeeChat does not start
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 21879 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 21879 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
I installed WeeChat 1.3 using Guix 0.9.0 on Debian 8, but It doesn't
start when I run it. I get this error instead:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 563, in <module>
main()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 545, in main
known_paths = addusersitepackages(known_paths)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 272, in addusersitepackages
user_site = getusersitepackages()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 247, in getusersitepackages
user_base = getuserbase() # this will also set USER_BASE
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 237, in getuserbase
USER_BASE = get_config_var('userbase')
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py", line 582, in get_config_var
return get_config_vars().get(name)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py", line 528, in get_config_vars
_init_posix(_CONFIG_VARS)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py", line 412, in _init_posix
from _sysconfigdata import build_time_vars
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/_sysconfigdata.py", line 6, in <module>
from _sysconfigdata_nd import *
ImportError: No module named _sysconfigdata_nd
Thanks,
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 11/11/2015 03:06 PM, Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed WeeChat 1.3 using Guix 0.9.0 on Debian 8, but It doesn't
> start when I run it. I get this error instead:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 563, in <module>
> main()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 545, in main
> known_paths = addusersitepackages(known_paths)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 272, in addusersitepackages
> user_site = getusersitepackages()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 247, in getusersitepackages
> user_base = getuserbase() # this will also set USER_BASE
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 237, in getuserbase
> USER_BASE = get_config_var('userbase')
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py", line 582, in get_config_var
> return get_config_vars().get(name)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py", line 528, in get_config_vars
> _init_posix(_CONFIG_VARS)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py", line 412, in _init_posix
> from _sysconfigdata import build_time_vars
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/_sysconfigdata.py", line 6, in <module>
> from _sysconfigdata_nd import *
> ImportError: No module named _sysconfigdata_nd
>
Seems like you are using weechat from Guix using Python 2.7 from Debian,
which is a bit weird. Also, _sysconfigdata_nd is Debian-specific. What
is your PYTHONPATH?
Cyril.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:07:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi!
Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
> I installed WeeChat 1.3 using Guix 0.9.0 on Debian 8, but It doesn't
> start when I run it. I get this error instead:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 563, in <module>
> main()
On closer inspection, this comes from the fact that Weechat looks for a
‘python’ executable in $PATH. See src/plugins/python/weechat-python.c
in Weechat.
In your case, it ended up running Debian’s Python, which then failed for
reasons that are unclear to me.
I believe this is fixed by a9346fa and 7be4a4b. Could you confirm?
You could run ‘guix pull’ or pull from a current ‘master’ checkout.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2015-11-18 12:06, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
>
>> I installed WeeChat 1.3 using Guix 0.9.0 on Debian 8, but It doesn't
>> start when I run it. I get this error instead:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 563, in <module>
>> main()
>
> On closer inspection, this comes from the fact that Weechat looks for a
> ‘python’ executable in $PATH. See src/plugins/python/weechat-python.c
> in Weechat.
>
> In your case, it ended up running Debian’s Python, which then failed
> for
> reasons that are unclear to me.
>
> I believe this is fixed by a9346fa and 7be4a4b. Could you confirm?
> You could run ‘guix pull’ or pull from a current ‘master’ checkout.
In a different machine, but still Debian 8 and Guix 0.9.0:
1. I ran 'guix pull'
2. Installed weechat
I get the same error.
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:45:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 11/18/2015 09:05 PM, Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote:
> In a different machine, but still Debian 8 and Guix 0.9.0:
>
> 1. I ran 'guix pull'
> 2. Installed weechat
>
> I get the same error.
On Debian Sid + Guix, I installed weechat in a "guix environment", and
could not reproduce the issue (weechat properly starts). However,
running "PATH=/usr/bin:$PATH weechat" leads to the same error you witnessed.
Could you post you PATH and PYTHONPATH?
Cyril.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> On 11/18/2015 09:05 PM, Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote:
>> In a different machine, but still Debian 8 and Guix 0.9.0:
>>
>> 1. I ran 'guix pull'
>> 2. Installed weechat
>>
>> I get the same error.
>
> On Debian Sid + Guix, I installed weechat in a "guix environment", and
> could not reproduce the issue (weechat properly starts). However,
> running "PATH=/usr/bin:$PATH weechat" leads to the same error you witnessed.
>
> Could you post you PATH and PYTHONPATH?
Could you double-check what’s happening, possibly running it through
strace to see if it’s actually executing /usr/bin/python?
Maybe my attempt was misguided and the problem is actually not in the
Python plugin but in some core part?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 11/18/2015 10:22 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Could you double-check what’s happening, possibly running it through
> strace to see if it’s actually executing /usr/bin/python?
I'm pretty sure it does that. It even loads libraries from the Debian
Python path, that is why it tries to import a Debian-specific module.
Cyril.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:43:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> On 11/18/2015 10:22 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Could you double-check what’s happening, possibly running it through
>> strace to see if it’s actually executing /usr/bin/python?
>
> I'm pretty sure it does that. It even loads libraries from the Debian
> Python path, that is why it tries to import a Debian-specific module.
Weird. Could you check with strace and/or GDB to confirm and see where
it’s coming from?
When I run it through strace, I don’t see any attempt to exec python.
TIA. :-)
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:02:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> On 11/18/2015 10:22 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Could you double-check what’s happening, possibly running it through
>> strace to see if it’s actually executing /usr/bin/python?
>
> I'm pretty sure it does that. It even loads libraries from the Debian
> Python path, that is why it tries to import a Debian-specific module.
I tried this:
guix environment --container --ad-hoc weechat strace coreutils \
findutils sed grep less --expose=$(which false)=/usr/bin/python
which installs ‘false’ as /usr/bin/python, but it still works fine.
Felipe, could you report the values of the ‘PYTHONPATH’, ‘PATH’, and
‘LD_LIBRARY_PATH’ variables on your system?
Are you able to work around the problem with:
guix environment --ad-hoc weechat --pure -- weechat
?
TIA,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:13:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2015-11-29 06:01, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
> Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> On 11/18/2015 10:22 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> Could you double-check what’s happening, possibly running it through
>>> strace to see if it’s actually executing /usr/bin/python?
>>
>> I'm pretty sure it does that. It even loads libraries from the Debian
>> Python path, that is why it tries to import a Debian-specific module.
>
> I tried this:
>
> guix environment --container --ad-hoc weechat strace coreutils \
> findutils sed grep less --expose=$(which false)=/usr/bin/python
>
> which installs ‘false’ as /usr/bin/python, but it still works fine.
>
> Felipe, could you report the values of the ‘PYTHONPATH’, ‘PATH’, and
> ‘LD_LIBRARY_PATH’ variables on your system?
>
Oh, I didn't get Cyril's messages on the bug... But this is the
information:
PYTHONPATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are empty. PATH has this value:
/home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
Additional info:
$ guix package --search-paths
export PATH="/home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin"
> Are you able to work around the problem with:
>
> guix environment --ad-hoc weechat --pure -- weechat
>
> ?
WeeChat starts correctly if I run it that way.
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 29 Nov 2015 15:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #35 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
> On 2015-11-29 06:01, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
[...]
>> Felipe, could you report the values of the ‘PYTHONPATH’, ‘PATH’, and
>> ‘LD_LIBRARY_PATH’ variables on your system?
>>
>
> Oh, I didn't get Cyril's messages on the bug... But this is the
> information:
>
> PYTHONPATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are empty. PATH has this value:
>
> /home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
>
> Additional info:
>
> $ guix package --search-paths
> export PATH="/home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin"
>
>
>> Are you able to work around the problem with:
>>
>> guix environment --ad-hoc weechat --pure -- weechat
>>
>> ?
>
> WeeChat starts correctly if I run it that way.
What if you do:
guix package -i python-2
weechat
?
TIA,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 29 Nov 2015 15:45:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #38 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2015-11-29 10:00, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
>
>> On 2015-11-29 06:01, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Felipe, could you report the values of the ‘PYTHONPATH’, ‘PATH’, and
>>> ‘LD_LIBRARY_PATH’ variables on your system?
>>>
>>
>> Oh, I didn't get Cyril's messages on the bug... But this is the
>> information:
>>
>> PYTHONPATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are empty. PATH has this value:
>>
>> /home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
>>
>> Additional info:
>>
>> $ guix package --search-paths
>> export PATH="/home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin"
>>
>>
>>> Are you able to work around the problem with:
>>>
>>> guix environment --ad-hoc weechat --pure -- weechat
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> WeeChat starts correctly if I run it that way.
>
> What if you do:
>
> guix package -i python-2
> weechat
>
WeeChat starts correctly after doing that.
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #41 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
> On 2015-11-29 10:00, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
>> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
>>
>>> On 2015-11-29 06:01, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> Felipe, could you report the values of the ‘PYTHONPATH’, ‘PATH’, and
>>>> ‘LD_LIBRARY_PATH’ variables on your system?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, I didn't get Cyril's messages on the bug... But this is the
>>> information:
>>>
>>> PYTHONPATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are empty. PATH has this value:
>>>
>>> /home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
>>>
>>> Additional info:
>>>
>>> $ guix package --search-paths
>>> export PATH="/home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin"
>>>
>>>
>>>> Are you able to work around the problem with:
>>>>
>>>> guix environment --ad-hoc weechat --pure -- weechat
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>
>>> WeeChat starts correctly if I run it that way.
>>
>> What if you do:
>>
>> guix package -i python-2
>> weechat
>>
>
> WeeChat starts correctly after doing that.
Hmm, hmm! In commit cb7bd0c, I fixed a build issue with the Python
plugin (it was statically linking libpython.a, which is undesirable.)
Could you check if that makes a difference, removing Python from your
profile?
Thanks for your help!
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:22:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #44 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2015-11-29 13:20, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
>
>> On 2015-11-29 10:00, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
>>> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-11-29 06:01, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> Felipe, could you report the values of the ‘PYTHONPATH’, ‘PATH’,
>>>>> and
>>>>> ‘LD_LIBRARY_PATH’ variables on your system?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I didn't get Cyril's messages on the bug... But this is the
>>>> information:
>>>>
>>>> PYTHONPATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are empty. PATH has this value:
>>>>
>>>> /home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
>>>>
>>>> Additional info:
>>>>
>>>> $ guix package --search-paths
>>>> export PATH="/home/anonimo/.guix-profile/bin"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Are you able to work around the problem with:
>>>>>
>>>>> guix environment --ad-hoc weechat --pure -- weechat
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> WeeChat starts correctly if I run it that way.
>>>
>>> What if you do:
>>>
>>> guix package -i python-2
>>> weechat
>>>
>>
>> WeeChat starts correctly after doing that.
>
> Hmm, hmm! In commit cb7bd0c, I fixed a build issue with the Python
> plugin (it was statically linking libpython.a, which is undesirable.)
>
> Could you check if that makes a difference, removing Python from your
> profile?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Ludo’.
- Removed Python and WeeChat from my profile.
- Did guix pull.
- Reinstalled WeeChat.
The error persists.
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:06:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #47 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I noticed this as well on a foreign distro and pushed a workaround in
507809be152049dff26bffdb58e1a90b638f046b.
Didn't study the source enough to figure out why the substitution was
insufficient, but strace confirmed it was still looking in PATH even
though the strings were replaced.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:53:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #52 received at 21879-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:
> I noticed this as well on a foreign distro and pushed a workaround in
> 507809be152049dff26bffdb58e1a90b638f046b.
>
> Didn't study the source enough to figure out why the substitution was
> insufficient, but strace confirmed it was still looking in PATH even
> though the strings were replaced.
Thanks for fixing it!
Make sure to email NNN-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org next time. ;-)
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 25 Feb 2017 14:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #55 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Actually, I'm still experiencing this bug with Guix 0.12.0 on Debian 8.7.
---
https://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:00:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #58 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:13:48AM -0500, sirgazil wrote:
> Actually, I'm still experiencing this bug with Guix 0.12.0 on Debian 8.7.
The commit that worked around the issue was applied after the 0.12.0
release. Have you updated your copy of Guix (with `guix pull`) since the
0.12.0 release?
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:36:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #61 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: bug#21879: WeeChat does not start
Local Time: 25 de febrero de 2017 10:59 AM
UTC Time: 25 de febrero de 2017 15:59
From: leo <at> famulari.name
To: sirgazil <lizagris <at> protonmail.com>
21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org <21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:13:48AM -0500, sirgazil wrote:
> Actually, I'm still experiencing this bug with Guix 0.12.0 on Debian 8.7.
The commit that worked around the issue was applied after the 0.12.0
release. Have you updated your copy of Guix (with `guix pull`) since the
0.12.0 release?
Thanks, Leo. I installed WeeChat after "guix pull" and it worked.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #64 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 17-02-25 11:35:45, sirgazil wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: bug#21879: WeeChat does not start
> Local Time: 25 de febrero de 2017 10:59 AM
> UTC Time: 25 de febrero de 2017 15:59
> From: leo <at> famulari.name
> To: sirgazil <lizagris <at> protonmail.com>
> 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org <21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:13:48AM -0500, sirgazil wrote:
> > Actually, I'm still experiencing this bug with Guix 0.12.0 on Debian 8.7.
>
> The commit that worked around the issue was applied after the 0.12.0
> release. Have you updated your copy of Guix (with `guix pull`) since the
> 0.12.0 release?
>
> Thanks, Leo. I installed WeeChat after "guix pull" and it worked.
A while ago Leo or someone else uponed a bug on improving the
Documentation about the relevance and usage of package+system updates.
It seems to me as if that's the case here, the documentation not being
clear enough.
Do you have any improvement suggestions?
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21879
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #67 received at 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: bug#21879: WeeChat does not start
Local Time: 25 de febrero de 2017 11:52 AM
UTC Time: 25 de febrero de 2017 16:52
From: contact.ng0 <at> cryptolab.net
To: sirgazil <lizagris <at> protonmail.com>
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>, 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org <21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
On 17-02-25 11:35:45, sirgazil wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: bug#21879: WeeChat does not start
> Local Time: 25 de febrero de 2017 10:59 AM
> UTC Time: 25 de febrero de 2017 15:59
> From: leo <at> famulari.name
> To: sirgazil <lizagris <at> protonmail.com>
> 21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org <21879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:13:48AM -0500, sirgazil wrote:
> > Actually, I'm still experiencing this bug with Guix 0.12.0 on Debian 8.7.
>
> The commit that worked around the issue was applied after the 0.12.0
> release. Have you updated your copy of Guix (with `guix pull`) since the
> 0.12.0 release?
>
> Thanks, Leo. I installed WeeChat after "guix pull" and it worked.
A while ago Leo or someone else uponed a bug on improving the
Documentation about the relevance and usage of package+system updates.
It seems to me as if that's the case here, the documentation not being
clear enough.
Do you have any improvement suggestions?
Thanks.
Good! Documentation is one part. I'll read the bug you mention (https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25852) and see if I have anything to contribute.
Thank you, ng0.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 42 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.