GNU bug report logs - #23969
hard to understand error message

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:07:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 23969 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 23969 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#23969; Package guix. (Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:07:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:07:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: hard to understand error message
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 09:48:08 +0200
Hello,

I'm discovering guix, and started to try to package something.

I made an error (add a string URL parameter to license x11-style):

(license x11-style "file://LICENSE")

But this is not working, because I've forgotten the scheme call syntax
(missing parens)

I'll fix my package definition with:

(license (x11-style "file://LICENSE"))

which seems to be working OK...

But the error message I got was very unhelpful:

something.scm:10:2: warning: source expression failed to match any pattern

the line 10 is:
  (package

whereas the real error happened on line 32 (the license one)

So what's wrong:
- wrong line number
- 'source expression' meaning is shady, as there is a "(source (origin
...))" element defined in the package, which is also not on line 10,
but misleading anyways

I would have expected that error to be reported as:

error: license x11-style: cannot match the pattern : file://LICENSE in
directory /tmp/guix-build-something/something/path/to/where/it/searched

-- 
Vincent Legoll




Reply sent to ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès):
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:11:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:11:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 23969-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 23969-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23969: hard to understand error message
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:09:59 +0200
Hi,

Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> I'm discovering guix, and started to try to package something.
>
> I made an error (add a string URL parameter to license x11-style):
>
> (license x11-style "file://LICENSE")
>
> But this is not working, because I've forgotten the scheme call syntax
> (missing parens)
>
> I'll fix my package definition with:
>
> (license (x11-style "file://LICENSE"))
>
> which seems to be working OK...
>
> But the error message I got was very unhelpful:
>
> something.scm:10:2: warning: source expression failed to match any pattern
>
> the line 10 is:
>   (package
>
> whereas the real error happened on line 32 (the license one)
>
> So what's wrong:
> - wrong line number
> - 'source expression' meaning is shady, as there is a "(source (origin
> ...))" element defined in the package, which is also not on line 10,
> but misleading anyways

Indeed.  This is fixed or at least improved in commit
babc2c80a7e1f1b5e72fd1685ef6604b93157a8e.  Now the message looks like:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
ice-9/psyntax.scm:1422:32: Syntax error:
gnu/packages/idutils.scm:42:4: package: invalid field specifier in form (synopsis "Identifier database utilities" foo)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Thanks,
Ludo’.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 7 years and 251 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.