GNU bug report logs - #23633
artanis package installation broken

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 23633 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 23633 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: artanis package installation broken
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:03:31 -0400

The artanis package creates a broken directory hierarchy like this:

/gnu/store/3090pddgmcqb989jwa7888nsvpcfkzqz-artanis-0.1.2
├── etc
│   ├── artanis
│   │   ├── 205.html
│   │   ├── 301.html
│   │   ├── 400.html
│   │   ├── 401.html
│   │   ├── 403.html
│   │   ├── 404.html
│   │   ├── 405.html
│   │   ├── 408.html
│   │   ├── 500.html
│   │   ├── 502.html
│   │   ├── 503.html
│   │   ├── 504.html
│   │   └── updating.html
│   ├── artanis.conf
│   └── bash_completion.d
│       └── show-cmds.sh
└── gnu
    └── store
        └── 3090pddgmcqb989jwa7888nsvpcfkzqz-artanis-0.1.2
            ├── bin
            │   └── art
[...]

Our package definition does change of bunch of paths from the default,
but I couldn't figure out why this was happening. Any takers?

Message #10 received at 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno <at> openmailbox.org>
To: 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23633: artanis package installation broken
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 23:01:13 -0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I have sent a patch that tries to fix the issue.

See: <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?9130>


-- 
# pt-BR: Brasileiro | en: Brazilian

* pt-BR: Palestra sobre liberdade de software (movimento filosófico político-social, não tecnológico).
  * en: Gives talks about software freedom (philosophical, political and social movement, not technological).
* pt-BR: Voluntário avaliador de liberdade de software (para software pagos ou gratuitos).
  * en: Volunteer evaluator of software freedom (for paid software, or gratis software).
* pt-BR: Presta suporte e consultoria básicos sobre software livre.
  * en: Gives basic support and consulting about free/libre software.

## pt-BR: Sobre mim e contato | en: About me and contact
<https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno>

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #13 received at 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23633: artanis package installation broken
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:44:29 +0200

Hi,

Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:

> I have sent a patch that tries to fix the issue.
>
> See: <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?9130>

Nice!

Could you turn it into a patch for Guix?  Essentially we would add the
upstream patch to the ‘patches’ field of our Artanis package.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Message #16 received at 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno <at> openmailbox.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23633: artanis package installation broken
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:59:17 -0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I was thinking of editing the current recipe so as to get the package
from their current repository commit. What do you think? Should we do as
I said just now, or should we do as you suggested?

There's still one patch that I made for Artanis, that is supposed to
correct a mistake I did in the Makefile and also correct a mistake they
made in a new Scheme script. I'm still waiting for this patch to be
approved.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #19 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno <at> openmailbox.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23633: artanis package installation broken
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:03:31 -0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I sent another patch to fix my typos in the Makefile and typo in a
Scheme script, made by someone else, see:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?9131>.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #22 received at 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23633: artanis package installation broken
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 23:52:24 +0200

Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:

> I was thinking of editing the current recipe so as to get the package
> from their current repository commit. What do you think? Should we do as
> I said just now, or should we do as you suggested?

I prefer to minimize changes compared to upstream’s release.  So that
would mean turning your patch into a Guix patch.

Would it work for you?

Or we could wait for the next Artanis release if it’s going to happen
soonish.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Message #25 received at 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno <at> openmailbox.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 23633 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23633: artanis package installation broken
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 22:37:36 -0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

That's OK, I'm sending a patch in guix-devel mailing list now.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #30 received at 23633-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: 23633-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Close: artanis package installation broken
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 22:25:37 +0100

The problem does not occur any more in the current artanis package,
version 0.2.1-3.

Andreas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.