GNU bug report logs -
#22836
“guix build -S” fails when “source” is #f
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 22836 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 22836 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22836
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I just did this:
guix build -S xfce
This resulted in this error message:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
157: 18 [catch #t #<catch-closure 19a6780> ...]
In unknown file:
?: 17 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 19a6780>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
63: 16 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
432: 15 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2401: 14 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 19c4940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
4050: 13 [#<procedure 19c4940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
1724: 12 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
1729: 11 [#<procedure 19dbea0 ()>]
In unknown file:
?: 10 [primitive-load "/home/rekado/dev/guix/scripts/guix"]
In guix/ui.scm:
1177: 9 [run-guix-command build "-S" "xfce"]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
157: 8 [catch srfi-34 #<procedure 205a080 at guix/ui.scm:413:2 ()> ...]
157: 7 [catch system-error ...]
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
638: 6 [#<procedure 205a120 at guix/scripts/build.scm:634:2 ()>]
591: 5 [options->derivations #<build-daemon 256.15 280efc0> (# # # # ...)]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
646: 4 [append-map #<procedure 280ebc0 at guix/scripts/build.scm:591:16 (expr)> #]
578: 3 [map #<procedure 280ebc0 at guix/scripts/build.scm:591:16 (expr)> (#)]
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
598: 2 [#<procedure 280ebc0 at guix/scripts/build.scm:591:16 (expr)> #]
In guix/store.scm:
1017: 1 [#<procedure 206fbe0 at guix/store.scm:1016:26 (store . args)> # #f]
In guix/packages.scm:
1073: 0 [origin->derivation #f "x86_64-linux"]
guix/packages.scm:1073:2: In procedure origin->derivation:
guix/packages.scm:1073:2: Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching pattern" #f)'.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That’s expected, because the “xfce” package is a meta-package and thus
does not have any sources of its own. The “source” field is “#f”.
Guix should print a nice error message informing the user that the
requested package does not have any sources.
~~ Ricardo
Reply sent
to
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:48:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:48:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 22836-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> skribis:
> I just did this:
>
> guix build -S xfce
>
> This resulted in this error message:
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 157: 18 [catch #t #<catch-closure 19a6780> ...]
> In unknown file:
> ?: 17 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 19a6780>]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 63: 16 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 432: 15 [eval # #]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2401: 14 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 19c4940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
> 4050: 13 [#<procedure 19c4940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
> 1724: 12 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
> 1729: 11 [#<procedure 19dbea0 ()>]
> In unknown file:
> ?: 10 [primitive-load "/home/rekado/dev/guix/scripts/guix"]
> In guix/ui.scm:
> 1177: 9 [run-guix-command build "-S" "xfce"]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 157: 8 [catch srfi-34 #<procedure 205a080 at guix/ui.scm:413:2 ()> ...]
> 157: 7 [catch system-error ...]
> In guix/scripts/build.scm:
> 638: 6 [#<procedure 205a120 at guix/scripts/build.scm:634:2 ()>]
> 591: 5 [options->derivations #<build-daemon 256.15 280efc0> (# # # # ...)]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 646: 4 [append-map #<procedure 280ebc0 at guix/scripts/build.scm:591:16 (expr)> #]
> 578: 3 [map #<procedure 280ebc0 at guix/scripts/build.scm:591:16 (expr)> (#)]
> In guix/scripts/build.scm:
> 598: 2 [#<procedure 280ebc0 at guix/scripts/build.scm:591:16 (expr)> #]
> In guix/store.scm:
> 1017: 1 [#<procedure 206fbe0 at guix/store.scm:1016:26 (store . args)> # #f]
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1073: 0 [origin->derivation #f "x86_64-linux"]
>
> guix/packages.scm:1073:2: In procedure origin->derivation:
> guix/packages.scm:1073:2: Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching pattern" #f)'.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> That’s expected, because the “xfce” package is a meta-package and thus
> does not have any sources of its own. The “source” field is “#f”.
Fixed in 8a54c0ec694ad6e22b155d167552b8fd0914e82d.
I made it a warning so that one can still use things like:
guix build -S `guix package -A | cut -f1`
Thanks!
Ludo’.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 193 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.