GNU bug report logs - #11611
closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: David Jaquay <djaquay <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:07:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 11611 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 11611 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#11611; Package guile. (Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to David Jaquay <djaquay <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guile <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: David Jaquay <djaquay <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:42:41 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Section 6.9.7 mentions the procedure closure?, but doesn't document it
(with procedure? and thunk?).  (Very minor issue.)

Dave

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Reply sent to ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès):
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:24:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to David Jaquay <djaquay <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 11611-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: David Jaquay <djaquay <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 11611-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11611: closure? missing from 2.0.5 docs
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:19:39 +0200

Hi,

‘closure?’ is deprecated in 2.0, hence its absence from the manual.
Users are directed to ‘procedure?’ instead.

Thanks,
Ludo’.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 306 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.